Saturday, September 24, 2011

God is near by James Herriot


The card dangled above the old lady's bed.  It read GOD IS NEAR but it wasn't like the usual religious text.  It didn't have a frame or ornate printing.  It was just a strip of cardboard about eight inches long with plain lettering which might have said "No smoking" or "Exit" and it was looped carelessly over an old brass gas bracket so that Miss Stubbs from where she lay could look up at it and read GOD IS NEAR in square black capitals.
There wasn't much more Miss Stubbs could see; perhaps a few feet of privet hedge through the frayed curtains but mainly it was just the cluttered little room which had been her world for so many years.
The room was on the ground floor and in the front of the cottage, and as I came up through the wilderness which had once been a garden I could see the dogs watching me from where they had jumped onto the old lady's bed by the window.  And when I knocked on the door the place almost erupted with their barking.  It was always like this.  I had been visiting regularly for over a year and the pattern never changed; the furious barking, then Mrs.  Broadwith, who looked after Miss Stubbs, would push all the animals but my patient into the back kitchen and open the door and I would go in and see Miss Stubbs in the corner in her bed with the card hanging over it.
She had been there for a long time and would never get up again.  But she never mentioned her illness and pain to me; all her concern was for her three dogs and two cats.
Today it was old Prince and I was worried about him.  It was his heart--just about the most spectacular valvular incompetence I had ever heard.  He was waiting for me as I came in, pleased to see me, his long fringed tail waving gently.
The sight of that tail used to make me think there must be a lot of Irish setter in Prince but I was inclined to change my mind as I worked my way forward over the bulging black and brown body to the shaggy head and upstanding Alsatian-type ears-well, at least he kept one of them upright but the other tipped over at the top.  Miss Stubbs often used to call him "Mr.  Heinz" and though he may not have had 57 varieties in him, his hybrid vigor had stood him in good stead.  With his heart he should have been dead long ago.
"I thought I'd best give you a ring, Mr.  Herriot," Mrs.  Broadwith said.  She was a comfortable, elderly widow with a square, ruddy face contrasting sharply with the pinched features on the pillow.  "He's been coughing right bad this week and this morning he was a bit staggery.  Still eats well, though."
"I bet he does."  I ran my hands over the rolls of fat on the ribs.  "It would take something really drastic to put old Prince off his grub."
Miss Stubbs laughed from the bed and the old dog, his mouth wide, eyes dancing, seemed to be joining in the joke.  I put my stethoscope over his heart and listened, knowing well what I was going to hear.  They say the heart is supposed to go "Lub-dup, lub-dup," but Prince's went "swish-swoosh, swish-swoosh."  There seemed to be nearly as much blood leaking back as was being pumped into the circulatory system.  And another thing, the "swish-swoosh" was a good bit faster than last time; he was on oral digitalis but it wasn't quite doing its job.
Gloomily I moved the stethoscope over the rest of the chest.  Like all old dogs with a chronic heart weakness he had an ever-present bronchitis and I listened without enthusiasm to the symphony of whistles, babbles, squeaks and bubbles which signaled the workings of Prince's lungs.  The old dog stood very erect and proud, his tail still waving slowly.  He always took it as a tremendous compliment when I examined him and there was no doubt he was enjoying himself now.  Fortunately his was not a very painful ailment.
Straightening up, I patted his head, and he responded immediately by trying to put his paws on my chest.  He didn't quite make it and even that slight exertion started his ribs heaving and his tongue lolling.  I gave him an intramuscular injection of digitalin and another of morphine hydrochloride, which he accepted with apparent pleasure as part of the game.
"I hope that will steady his heart and breathing, Miss Stubbs.  You'll find he'll be a bit dopey for the rest of the day and that will help, too.  Carry on with the tablets as before, and I'm going to leave you some more medicine for his bronchitis."
The next stage of the visit began now as Mrs.  Broadwith brought in a cup of tea and the rest of the animals were let out of the kitchen.  There were Ben, a Sealyham, and Sally, a cocker spaniel, and they started a deafening barking contest with Prince.  They were closely followed by the cats, Arthur and Susie, who stalked in gracefully and began to rub themselves against my trouser legs.
It was the usual scenario for the many cups of tea I had drunk with Miss Stubbs under the little card which dangled above her bed.
"How are you today?"  I asked.
"Oh, much better," she replied and immediately, as always, changed the subject.
Mostly she liked to talk about her pets and the ones she had known right back to her girlhood.  She spoke a lot, too, about the days when her family were alive.  She loved to describe the escapades of her three brothers and today she showed me a photograph which Mrs.  Broadwith had found at the bottom of a drawer.
I took it from her and three young men in the knee breeches and little round caps of the eighteen-nineties smiled up at me from the yellowed old print; they all held long church warden pipes and the impish humor in their expressions came down undimmed over the years.
"My word, they look really bright lads, Miss Stubbs," I said.
"Oh, they were young rips!"  she exclaimed.  She threw back her head and laughed and for a moment her face was radiant, transfigured by her memories.
The things I had heard in the village came back to me; about the prosperous father and his family who lived in the big house many years ago.  Then the foreign investments which crashed and the sudden change in circumstances.  "When t'owd feller died he was about skint," one old man had said.  "There's not much brass there now."
Probably just enough brass to keep Miss Stubbs and her animals alive and to pay Mrs.  Broadwith.  Not enough to keep the garden dug or the house painted or for any of the normal little luxuries.
And, sitting there, drinking my tea, with the dogs in a row by the bedside and the cats making themselves comfortable on the bed itself, I felt as I had often felt before--a bit afraid of the responsibility I had.  The one thing which brought some light into the life of the brave old woman was the transparent devotion of this shaggy bunch whose eyes were never far from her face.  And the snag was that they were all elderly.
There had, in fact, been four dogs originally, but one of them, a truly ancient yellow Labrador, had died a few months previously.  And now I had the rest of them to look after and none of them less than ten years old.
They were perky enough but all showing some of the signs of old age; Prince with his heart, Sally beginning to drink a lot of water which made me wonder if her kidneys were giving trouble; Ben growing steadily thinner with his nephritis.  I couldn't give him new kidneys and I hadn't much faith in the tablets I had prescribed.  Another peculiar thing about Ben was that I was always having to clip his claws; they grew at an extraordinary rate.
The cats were better, though Susie was a bit scraggy and I kept up a morbid kneading of her furry abdomen for signs of lymphosarcoma.  Arthur was the best of the bunch; he never seemed to ail anything beyond a tendency for his teeth to attract tartar.
This must have been in Miss Stubbs's mind because, when I had finished my tea, she asked me to look at him.  I hauled him across the bedspread and opened his mouth.
"Yes, there's a bit of the old trouble there.  Might as well fix it while I'm here."
Arthur was a huge, gray neutered tom, a living denial of all those theories that cats are cold-natured, selfish, and the rest.  His fine eyes, framed in the widest cat face I have ever seen, looked out on the world with an all-embracing benevolence and tolerance.  His every movement was marked by immense dignity.
As I started to scrape his teeth his chest echoed with a booming purr like a distant outboard motor.  There was no need for anybody to hold him; he sat there placidly and moved only once-when I was using forceps to crack off a tough piece of tartar from a back tooth and accidentally nicked his gum.  He casually raised a massive paw as if to say "Have a care, chum," but his claws were sheathed.  * * *
My next visit was less than a month later and was in response to an urgent summons from Mrs.  Broadwith at six o'clock in the evening.  Ben had collapsed.  I jumped straight into my car and in less than ten minutes was threading my way through the overgrown grass in the front garden with just two dogs watching from their window.  The barking broke out as I knocked, but Ben's was absent.  As I went into the little room I saw the old dog lying on his side, very still, by the bed.
D.o.a. is what we write in the day book.  Dead On Arrival.  Just three words but they covered all kinds of situations--the end of milk fever cows, bloated bullocks, calves in fits.  And tonight they meant that I wouldn't be clipping old Ben's claws anymore.
"Well, it was quick, Miss Stubbs.  I'm sure the old chap didn't suffer at all."  My words sounded lame and ineffectual.
The old lady was in full command of herself.  No tears, only a fixity of expression as she looked down from the bed at her companion for so many years.  My idea was to get him out of the place as quickly as possible and I pulled a blanket under him and lifted him up.  As I was moving away, Miss Stubbs said, "Wait a moment."  With an effort she turned on her side and gazed at Ben.  Still without changing expression, she reached out and touched his head lightly.  Then she lay back calmly as I hurried from the room.
In the back kitchen I had a whispered conference with Mrs.  Broadwith.  "I'll run down t'village and get Fred Manners to come and bury him," she said.  "And if you've got time, could you stay with the old lady while I'm gone.  Talk to her, like, it'll do her good."
I went back and sat down by the bed.  Miss Stubbs looked out of the window for a few moments, then turned to me.  "You know, Mr.  Herriot," she said casually, "it will be my turn next."
"What do you mean?"
"Well, tonight Ben has gone and I'm going to be the next one.  I just know it."
"Oh, nonsense!  You're feeling a bit low, that's all.  We all do when something like this happens."  But I was disturbed.  I had never heard her even hint at such a thing before.
"I'm not afraid," she said.  "I know there's something better waiting for me.  I've never had any doubts."  There was silence between us as she lay calmly looking up at the card on the gas bracket.
Then the head on the pillow turned to me again.  "I have only one fear."  Her expression changed with startling suddenness as if a mask had dropped.  The brave face was almost unrecognizable.  A kind of terror flickered in her eyes and she quickly grasped my hand.
"It's the dogs and cats, Mr.  Herriot.  I'm afraid I might never see them when I'm gone which worries me so.  You see, I know I'll be reunited with my parents and brothers, but ... but ..."  She gazed at the two cats curled up at the end of her bed.
"Well, why not with your animals?"
"That's just it."  She rocked her head on the pillow and for the first time I saw tears on her cheeks.  "They say animals have no souls."
"Who says?"
"Oh, I've read it and I know a lot of religious people believe it."
"Well, I don't believe it."  I patted the hand which still grasped mine.  "If having a soul means being able to feel love and loyalty and gratitude, then animals are better off than a lot of humans.  You've nothing to worry about there."
"Oh, I hope you're right.  Sometimes I lie at night thinking about it."
"I know I'm right, Miss Stubbs, and don't you argue with me.  They teach us vets all about animals' souls."
The tension left her face and she laughed with a return of her old spirit.  "I'm sorry to bore you with this and I'm not going to talk about it again.  But before you go, I want you to be absolutely honest with me.  I don't want reassurance from you--just the truth.  I know you are very young but please tell me-what are your beliefs?  Will my animals go with me?"
She stared intently into my eyes.  I shifted in my chair and swallowed once or twice.
"Miss Stubbs, I'm afraid I'm a bit foggy about all this," I said.  "But I'm absolutely certain of one thing.  Wherever you are going, they are going too."
She still stared at me but her face was calm again.  "Thank you, Mr.  Herriot, I know you are being honest with me.  That is what you really believe, isn't it?"
"I do believe it," I said.  "With all my heart I believe it."  * * *
It must have been about a month later and it was entirely by accident that I learned I had seen Miss Stubbs for the last time.  When a lonely, penniless old woman dies people don't rush up to you in the street to tell you.  I was on my rounds and a farmer happened to mention that the cottage in Corby village was up for sale.
"But what about Miss Stubbs?"  I asked.
"Oh, went off sudden about three weeks ago.  House is in a bad state, they say--nowt been done at it for years."
"Mrs.  Broadwith isn't staying on, then?"
"Nay, I hear she's staying at t'other end of village."
"Do you know what's happened to the dogs and cats?"
"What dogs and cats?"
I cut my visit short.  And I didn't go straight home, though it was nearly lunchtime.  Instead I urged my complaining little car at top speed to Corby and asked the first person I saw where Mrs.  Broadwith was living.  It was a tiny house but attractive and Mrs.  Broadwith answered my knock herself.
"Oh, come in, Mr.  Herriot.  It's right good of you to call."  I went inside and we sat facing each other across a scrubbed tabletop.
"Well, it was sad about the old lady," she said.
"Yes, I've only just heard."
"Any road, she had a peaceful end.  Just slept away at finish."
"I'm glad to hear that."
Mrs.  Broadwith looked round the room.  "I was real lucky to get this place--it's just what I've always wanted."
I could contain myself no longer.  "What's happened to the animals?"  I blurted out.
"Oh, they're in t'garden," she said calmly.  "I've got a grand big stretch at back."  She got up and opened the door andwitha surge of relief I watched my old friends pour in.
Arthur was on my knee in a flash, arching himself ecstatically against my arm while his outboard motor roared softly above the barking of the dogs.  Prince, wheezy as ever, tail fanning the air, laughed up at me delightedly between barks.
"They look great, Mrs.  Broadwith.  How long are they going to be here?"
"They're here for good.  I think just as much about them as t'old lady ever did and I couldn't be parted from them.  They'll have a good home with me as long as they live."
I looked at the typical Yorkshire country face, at the heavy cheeks with their grim lines belied by the kindly eyes.  "This is wonderful," I said.  "But won't you find it just a bit ... er ... expensive to feed them?"
"Nay, you don't have to worry about that.  I 'ave a bit put away."
"Well, fine, fine, and I'll be looking in now and then to see how they are.  I'm through the village every few days."  I got up and started for the door.
Mrs.  Broadwith held up her hand.  "There's just one thing I'd like you to do before they start selling off the things at the cottage.  Would you please pop in and collect what's left of your medicines.  They're in t'front room."
I took the key and drove along to the other end of the village.  As I pushed open the rickety gate and began to walk through the tangled grass, the front of the cottage looked strangely lifeless without the faces of the dogs at the window; and when the door creaked open and I went inside the silence was like a heavy pall.
 Nothing had been moved.  The bed with its rumpled blankets was still in the corner.  I moved around, picking up half-empty bottles, a jar of ointment, the cardboard box with old Ben's tablets-a lot of good they had done him.
When I had got everything I looked slowly round the little room.  I wouldn't be coming here anymore and at the door I paused and read for the last time the card which hung over the empty bed. 

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

De Profundis | An Epistle by Oscar Wilde


Never can one find oneself so grossly incapacitated to pen a review.Never has the pen shivered or the wariness of error been engulfing so completely as to capture the essence of De Profundis. Although it is not a play or a proper novel by Wilde, it stands apart from his other works particularly because of the circumstances under which it was written. Oscar Wilde wrote the epistle from prison to his friend Lord Alfred Douglas. Perhaps Wilde smuggled toilet paper to write this long letter to vent his anger and disappointment towards Alfred (Bosie). In prison for 2 years and not having received a single communication from Bosie, Wilde is understandably livid and starts his letter by pillorying his friend for shallowness.

The letter recounts the events that "ruined" Wilde by his association with Bosie and accuses him of draining Wilde's savings. It also humorously paints the picture of Alfred as a man with epileptic tantrums and sentimentality. By describing the frequent tiffs between the two, Wilde wishes that Bosie would have part ways but quotes "As far as I can make out I ended my friendship with you every three months regularly, and each time that I did so you managed by means of entreaties, telegrams, letters, the interposition of your friends , the interposition of mine, and the like to induce me to allow you back"

The letter further describes how Wilde was "bored to death" by Bosie's talk and association and How Bosie and his father contributed to the ruin of Wilde as an artist and as a man of repute.It criticizes Bosie's father for making Wilde the scapegoat for the quarrel with his son and upshot was the trial that brought infamy to Wilde. Wilde writes "I required the rest and freedom from the terrible strain of your companionship. It was necessary for me to be little by myself. It was intellectually necessary. ". If bitter reproach was not enough , it draws vivid satire from the fact that Bosie followed Wilde across countries when Wilde would move to new cities like Paris without a forwarding address but alas Alfred wouldn't give up. He was told "I would absolutely decline to see you; you reminded me that for the sake of seeing me even for one hour you had travelled six days and nights across Europe without stopping once on the way: you made what I must admit was a most pathetic appeal, and ended with what seemed to me a threat of suicide, and one not thinly veiled."

From scorn and ridicule of Alfred for his pettiness, extravagance and greed, the tone of the letter slowly changes to remorse and introspection where Wilde admits that he had learnt his lesson and there was meaning in his suffering. It had made him arrive at a discovery.And there emerges the optimism when he says that he had tuned his good life into evil but now he will turn the evil thing of his life to good. He discerns that there is something good in this whole trial and imprisonment. Wilde believes he can assert himself as an artist again. "Sorrow remarries us to God" so says Wilde to accentuate the supreme emotion of sorrow in shaping a man's character.

An Epistle as passionate, as critical as De Profundis, strewn with remorse, acceptance and determination is hard not to admire.The vestiges of hypocrisy are absent despite its candid observations of society, the church and the legal system which is called "absolutely and entirely wrong". It is blotted with tears and yet radiates the indomitable spirit of Oscar Wilde, for the genius he was and allows us a sneak-peek into the beautiful human being in him. For a wonderful exploration into the mindscape of Wilde, this letter is a must read. Admittedly I loved these lines most from the work :

"I am quite candid when I tell you that rather than go out from this prison with bitterness in my heart against you or against the world I would gladly and readily beg my bread from door to door. If I got nothing at the house of the rich, I would get something at the house of the poor. Those who have much are often greedy. Those who have little always share."

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

A Tale of Two Cities - Charles Dickens


Who else could be a better raconteur to describe a society fraught with poverty and injustice? A society where hunger is pervasive. Hunger is in every face. Hunger is in every distressed conversation. A famished land boils in unrest. Who else could portray the mindscape of the populace more aptly than Charles Dickens as he opens his most popular novel with the paragraph:

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us.."

By choosing to pen a novel on revolutionary France, Dickens takes a huge risk stepping on a subject known little to him. His domestic estrangement with his wife and separation from his publisher seem to cloud his career. However, it does not stop him from travelling to Paris for his homework. The cataclysmic events of the revolution are depicted around the family of Doctor Manette who has been imprisoned and released by the despotic French aristocracy. Doctor Manette reunites with his daughter Lucie Manette, lives with her in England. With father's approval, Lucie marries erstwhile French aristocrat Charles Darney who sympathizes with the bourgeois. There are other characters like Miss Pross who is the caretaker of Lucie and Mr Lorry at the Tellsons bank in Paris who is a good friend of the Manettes and so is Sydney Carton, whose role in the plot seems conspicuous. The indignant elements of the bourgeois are depicted by Mr and Madame Defrage at a bar in Paris.


The revolution galvanizes the nation. The juggernaut of change seems to spare no one, not the bad, not the good, not the slothful, not the industrious, not the woodsawyer on the street, not the tyrannical Aristocrat in the Chateau. The castle of Bastille is stormed. Women like Madame Defrage and her ilk have become inured by injustice from childhood. They are stone-hearted enough to be ready to slaughter anyone associated with the regime. When Charles happens to visit Paris, he is incarcerated and the depressing realities of the revolution unfold in the lives of the Manettes. They realize that change need not be always for the better and change could be ruthless, change could lead to mob justice. Madame Defrage turns out to be the nemesis of the of the Manettes and her supporters are ready to decimate any vestiges of the despised royalty.

Dickens unwraps the scenes with contradictory images and It bodes well with his prelude of the "best" and the "worst" of times. The events surrounding this middle class Victorian Family and its resolute opposition to be victimized, epitomizes the promise of love, the promise of humanity irrespective of the outcome of the Darney trial. As the denouement of the novel crystallizes in the fate of Darney, Dickens looks at a land that rises from the ashes. The values of "Liberté, égalité, fraternité ou la mout" seem conceivable and "mort" signifies that people have had enough and are ready for death if even one among the stated Egality, Liberty or Fraternity is compromised.

In effect, this novel is a masterpiece. Its riveting portrayal also helps a reader map the society of today with the society then to perceive quite easily the fact that despotic regimes still exist. Farcical democracies still deceive people of their rights, indulge in massive corruption to empty the coffers of the taxpayer. However there is hope that people will see a future where they can trust their Government. They can feel assured of its motives and they can hold the reigns of power to decide their fate as citizens and the fate of the nation. It is thus certainly appropriate to quote these lines from Dickens in conclusion :

‎"I see a beautiful city and a brilliant people rising from this abyss, and, in their struggles to be truly free, in their triumphs and defeats, through long long years to come, I see the evil of this time and of the previous time of which this is the natural birth, gradually making expiation for itself and wearing out."

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Silas Marner | The Weaver of Raveloe | By George Eliot


No story could seem as mundane as that of a weaver in an English village.The ennui of this theme is buttressed by its occurrence in the Victorian era, where every movement, every conversation, every occasion, every instance of laughter and every emotion seems profusely genteel.

Silas Marner is the weaver of Raveloe, an agrarian community in the rural hinterlands of England. He lives in solitude, being self-exiled from his earlier dwelling after being falsely accused for murder. The belief in God and the hold in religion has been shaken for Silas, who has never entertained a malefic thought in his mind and who has professed his beliefs devoutly.

Sounding true to the premonition, when misfortune strikes, it strikes in a streak and Silas loses his hard earned money saved up for fifteen years in a heist. A life beset by events that question the benevolence and faith of Silas, is suddenly transformed by a new gift he finds without any effort.Nothing could have been more fortuitous for Silas, the gift happens to a baby girl called Eppie at his doorstep. Silas traces the baby to its dead mother outside his home and becomes a father for the girl who is orphan no more. Eppie and Silas fill each others life with ardour and the comfort of a family where a father finds meaning in his life and a daughter is blessed by a loving parent. Silas is enchanted by the new presence in his home. Eppie begins to ebb away the forlornness in his life and his monetary loss seems so trifling to his reward from God. Silas is no longer ignored by the people of Raveloe, he is part of the community and everyone knows him by Silas as opposed to the 'weaver'. The denouement of the story is reached when Eppie's real father seeks her custody and Silas is left to ponder at his merciless fate.

A brilliant work of fiction from George Eliot, this short novel of hers throws light on the complex relationship an individual and the society has with his religion. It cleverly exposes the vice and immorality that has firmly ensconced itself among the clergy and yet it does not seek to censure or shun religion or theologists.

Eliot seems to focus on painting situations that leave a deep impression on her readers to help them form their own opinion rather than evincing a view or moralising a story.An attentive reader would be able to discern how the author exposes the gullibility of the reader as she contradicts her own narratives and mocks at the docility of people,yet she does not belittle her readers, in turn, she helps her readers emerge mindful of the judgements they draw from the writing.

Summarily, Silas Marner is a novel that challenges our perceptions and perhaps even taunts us intellectually to question faith, society and life in a whole new way.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

In any academic area or professional field it is just as important to recognize the limits of knowledge and understanding as it is acquire new facts

In this world where science has revolutionized the way we live.Fields of academia are extremely diverse. Each field is advancing with continual research and innovation. As the frontiers of science are expanded by the humankind , it is indeed necessary to appreciate and recognize the limits of our understanding of any realm so that we stay on the path of progress in the field of discovery.

Let's assume that humankind momentarily believes that its understanding of science or any one realm of science is complete and fully understood. to see the consequences. We need not go far in history to find an example. In the field of astronomy, many astronomers believed a few centuries ago , that the sun revolves around the earth. This premise was backed by the vanguards , who at the helm , backed this idea so profoundly that they rejected any other school of thought which disagreed.Kepler was unfortunate to state the new laws of planetary motion. His views cost him his life. If only the astronomers listened to Kepler and debated with proof than scoff at his idea , the world would have realized the Kepler's laws of planetary motion much sooner.

A good reason for recognizing our limits of knowledge would be the necessity for innovators in any academic or professional field to think out of the box.They need to question the already laid out rules in the book.They need to understand the fundamentals in and out to succeed.In such an investigative process, it is a possibility that the existing premises are challenged and a drastic new approach is presented and proved. This fact is evident when Albert Einstein refused to accept the laws of Newtonian mechanics.He questioned its basis to develop the theory of relativity that does not obey the laws of motion postulated by Newton.

Yet another reason is that any scientific community needs competition. The diversity of thought and its application fosters competition that in its true spirit that tries to solve the same problem that boggles researchers in their respective realms. Competing thoughts help establish new theories and innovation is encouraged.Would it have been possible to see the internet revolution that has changed the way we live and communicate in the 21st century unless a set of university students at Berkley fundamentally wanted to alter the state of the computing world? They questioned the state where bulky mainframes ruled and brought the idea of distributed computing where computers cooperated to achieve a task. This idea required networking and it led to the birth of the Internet.

Summarily , for any scientific realm to remain vibrant, we need to recognize that there is more to be learnt and understood.The age old Tamil proverb outside NASA headquarters couldn't be more true and it is translated as:

" What is known to mankind is equivalent in size to a heap of sand, the unlearnt, unknown and unconquered is as big as the world."

Most people think that their deeply held values are the result of rational choice, but reason often has to do little with the way people form values

It is indeed difficult to ascertain if deeply held values of people are strongly grounded in reason.However , It will be helpful if we analyzed one of the deeply held values and and try to discover the rationale, if any.If we happen to find at least one deeply held value that is held by people in a society to be of sound reason, we can draw significant conclusions.

Let's start with one deeply held value that stems from religion.For thousands of years , the people of India who have been predominantly Hindus , have avoided the consumption of beef. It is a deeply held value and slaughtering the cow is a sacrilege in their religion.With the current exposure and globalization , it is often surmised that the "avoidance of beef" has no logic. It is even labeled as a superstition and a passe custom.This assertion is backed by the claim that the Hindu religion has no clear injunction and reason stated about the consumption of beef.But , let us look deeper.

Treating the avoidance of beef as a deeply held value, If one would look at the basis for such a value, at least one reason seems obvious. Hinduism being a pacifist religion discourages the consumption of meat.The cow as a part of the rural and urban household in ancient India supplied the home with milk and milk products. Its waste is used as fuel and manure and cow urine was used as a medicine today and patented for its medicinal properties wherein nursing mothers are provided a concoction of the same called "Panchkavya" even today. Slaughtering an animal that provides the household with so many benefits would have just seemed ungrateful, cruel and immoral. It is well known that many Englishmen in their pig-farm do not name the pigs and just number them.They are known to say naming them makes it hard when slaughtering them.Hindu household that often named the cow with names of Goddesses like "Lakshmi" ( the Goddesses of wealth and prosperity ) could have found it inconceivable to kill the animal.

This may not have been the only reason. Agrarian societies in ancient India might have noticed that amount of grain expended in rearing livestock as opposed to sustenance in vegetarian food is many a time greater. This is a very strong reason to opt for vegetarian food.It is wise to have the cow provide for the household than kill it and lose steady supply of milk.It is wise to use the bull in the field than kill it.It it were an older bull , that could not plough, it seemed again immoral to the peasant who saw the years the bull had toiled in his field.

Another reason could have been the Indian climate.The fat content in beef is highly unsuitable for digestion and weather of the subcontinent makes it a poor choice of diet.As for the taste buds, India has a cuisine with spices that is known to make food as tasty with or without meat.When so many reasons pile up against the case of beef , It is not surprising why the people of India chose not to consume beef.

When we started with the deeply held value, It might have seemed to exist without a reason.It might have made many of us scoff at such at such a value.However, as we can see with the reasons presented, it is definitely not deprived of logic.We also realize that we cannot generalize and write off all deeply held values as "irrational".It is indeed appropriate to treat each deeply held value at its own merit and try to analyse its reasons before arriving at a hasty conclusion.

Summarily , all societies from civilizations have value systems that stem from religion.It is necessary to for the present generation to be curious to understand the root if the values and try to ascertain its rationality.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Outliers | The Story of Success | Malcom Gladwell's book review

Many a time we regard our erstwhile classmate in twelfth grade who got into IIT as "gifted" or a "genius".Our parents heard from teachers who called this classmate( I am sure he was not a dear friend) a "child prodigy".It was not unusual for the "prodigy" to get into India's top engineering schools.We subliminally began to believe in ourself as a "mediocre".Our parents played an important role in the formation of this opinion.They compared our performance with the genius in the class one test after another.Naturally, we were slowly pushed into the bracket of averageness. For many of us this has been the situation hitherto. Perhaps it is time after many years to ask some questions. Can a student avoid this vicious cycle of stereotypes ? Should we fall prey to the victimhood ? Is this all about our innate ability ? Should any student be written off as a failure ?

As a high school student we brought the story that our capacity was circumscribed by our "IQ".We thought all great people in the world had substantially higher IQ's to steer them towards success of which we only dreamed.Are we really destined to be the part of the proletarian lot to work in a mundane profession of drudgery without scaling the heights of science or arts or any other realm ? What differentiates an "Outlier" from the pack? To use the word "pack" may seem a terrible expression , but the "pack" is the pack due to a reason and an Outlier is an Outlier for many a reason.

Malcom Gladwell's 'Outliers' is the book that brilliantly argues the case of Outliers and explores the niche of an Outlier that made him excel beyond the ordinary.It looks at the opportunity that was available to the Outlier and discerns that the success of an Outlier is grounded in very favorable circumstances that enabled the person to seize the moment and rise to the occasion.

As an example, Bill Gates got a chance to work on Mainframes which was pretty expensive in his days and out of reach for a normal teenager. This happened just because his school had connections that helped him get "Mainframe time" and later Gates could make a deal with a firm ( that happened to be near his house) to get "desk time" on the Mainframe in exchange for being a "tester".Yes, even Bill Joy had favorable circumstances as he got more time in his college's mainframe computer by discovering a bug in the billing time that allowed him to use the system long enough to master programming without being drained in pocket , a chance inconceivable at the time. Bill Joy seized the opportunity and wrote the newer version of the UNIX operating system still in use today.He also rewrote Java!!.

The pertinence of effort in extraordinary achievement is underscored by perseverance of the Outlier.Gladwell debunks the idea of very high IQ solely playing a role in this phenomenon and explains that a "threshold" of IQ might be necessary to win a nobel prize but once a peron's IQ is above the threshold, it does not matter how high the IQ is, but how far the person's persistence is and how much a better his circumstances are.

The book explores the inextricable link of our culture and its legacy that shapes our personality and our habits for the world .The book presents the example of a family of peasants in China who work round the clock for a better harvest and this quality of hardwork is passed on to the children who invariably grow up to be successful lawyers or bankers when they come to the United States by outperforming their american counterparts in Math.The Chinese nomenclature of numbering also chips in to give its children an added advantage.

Summarily, the book is an engaging read that makes us slowly realize that an Outlier is in fact not an Outlier at all. It prepares us for this conclusion all along the chapters making its case stronger by every page.By the end of the book , a reader would probably be emancipated form the belief he would have held tenaciously on "geniuses" since tenth or twelfth grade. The reader would not be overboard to hope and believe that he too can be the Outlier, provided he looked for the right turns and worked hard as ever to win.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Subrahmanyan's hebdomadal Delhi trip hits an impediment : The Tale of the lost Possession

The excitement was in its acme.The packing and jamming was all done and the corny conversations about time of departure from the University, were at last approaching the denouement.Subrahmanyan and his collegiate pal Abhishek had made the infamous routine of darting off to Delhi all weeks through the semester and this week was no different..Not even because it was Apogee..the University's Tech festival.Like the sophomore year,even in masters,a normal trip seemed a junket ,when getting away from Grad school,as opposed to the onerous return journey.

The two were proud to leave their rooms shipshape..and as when walking the passageway,met a few curious onlookers(who were later recognized as classmates or friends or acquaintances).When inquired Subrahmanyan said in a lofty elevated tone "Yes ...I am doleful over this.. I couldn't stay this week with you guys for the tech fest"...and just then came Abhishek's sardonic rejoinder "indeed,you were sobbing all night for a planned absence".

Rushing to the nearby tuk-tuk they placed their baggage and reached the Pilani bus stand."The trains should be on time and we won't buy a ticket this time..its cheaper to bribe the TT than shell 150 rupees at the counter" remarked Subrahmanyan in a self-assuring wobble.

Abhishek opened his wallet saying "tuh tera das baad mein de diyo".Its 50-50 you see and every rupee needs to be divided(even if the 50 paisas were defunct) to get even with the math of travelling and walked past the bus before the train.

Evidently,Subrahmanyan tried keeping pace with his portly friend with a faster gait except for when he stooped and exclaimed "Where is your laundry bag??"

"scoot.. scoot and catch the driver " and there ran Subrahmanyan as if somebody had planted a foot on his back.But the tuk -tuk was nowhere to be seen...spotting every automobile with yellow or black paint seemed the only recourse.

..yet Abhishek asked "After all what was the fortune concealed in that bag..you might as well forget the Trousers "..
"But.. But I fell violated when I lose a bag" said Subrahmanyan..(this was not the first time a bag was left to the mercy of stranger or a tuk-tuk driver who was referred as a "chauffeur" to signal an upper class suburban upbringing).But more so as it seemed opprobrious to lose a bag to mindlessness.The dreadful thought of being reminded "If you cannot keep your things in order,how could you possibly claim to have learned to live alone in a hostel for 4 years" at home, made him pursue his possession with dogged determination.The huff and puff in chasing autos to descry the driver turned fruitless.

Abhishek was raring to go and said "This is what happens when you act over genteel".
"I am catching the bus and you can find the bag and come late".

It wasn't very dignified to return but Subrahmanyan did.Careful not to be spotted by anyone who had met him while leaving..he slithered like a serpent into the hostel and disappeared into his room.The fitful afternoon nap was interrupted when it struck "Ohh I should have checked in cannaught(the Market place in the university )".Late reflexes are commonplace with Subrahmanyan and yet he relishes to welcome them like a hoped-for friend on a summer visit.

Reaching cannaught with autos parked with drivers chatting and fuming beedis made him look for the fateful "chauffeur" .Upon spotted, the guy was relieved to give back the bag and pronounce "I did not even open it" ..

It was nightfall before Subrahmanyan could trod towards the stand with an itchy feet to board the bus to Delhi.Thankfully this time ,he met no inquiring onlookers , acquaintances or friends.


Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Bigot Avatar - Arundhati Roy?

Bigot Avatar - Arundhati Roy?

It may not be very chivalrous of me to lambaste a woman for speaking her mind. But the Booker prize winner has made gauche statements to the people of India. Despite trying hard to overlook , it forces the average Indian like me to respond.Seperatist Arundhati Roy and Comrade Geelani have questioned the territorial integrity of India? As the spineless government in Delhi has no nads to act on sedition, lest Arundhati forget: civil society is not behind her.

As India, inevitably protects its borders from irritant neighbours, Arundhaty Roy calls it "Militarization of Democracy".Does she realize what a phoney she looks by infuriating the people.She condones the 26/11 attacks to say; it has to be seen in context with 'partition of India' and the poverty in the subcontinent. Yellow eyed maybe, she does not see Maoist attacks as violence, but the defence of the state as ruthless.And then she is a "social activist",beware.She is painting her views on the coterie of activists( men with khaki kurtas and women draped in gothic saris and big bindis).But the jocular facet is,her contentions are both laughable and galling and therefore, she cannot hide beneath the sheep's skin.

Did Arundhati Roy forget the Kashmiri Pandit exodus in late 80's, lakhs of them forced to leave the valley because of extremism and intolerance.Geelani(emmisary of Pakistan) and Roy have not stood for minorities in the valley,Was Roy sapient enough to see a Kashmir with ONLY SECULAR rule under India, will bring egality to minorities? Did she forget the slaughter of Sikhs by Lashkar? Is she not perspicacious enough to fathom ,that security forces cannot leave Kashmir to the wolves waiting across the border? Was she, the blindfolded Ghandhari to forget that India strives to help minorities, has announced economic packages for Kashmir, provided opportunity to every Kashmiri to compete and participate in building a future within India. Let us remind Arundhati Roy that an Indian outside Kashmir cannot buy land in Kashmir, but vice versa is not prohibited.What kind of justice is this to the average Indian? She may not realize that, when mobs attack our security forces, they shall rightfully fire in self defence.

Freedom of speech gives the latitude to criticize the government, the policies, the state for malfunctioning. But Arundhati Roy is a criminal to incite sedition and she deserves her term in prison and should be muzzled for life in India. She has blatantly, flagrantly misused her freedom of speech to hurt the sentiments and the patriotic mindscape of India.She could live and work in China though and question Tibet's occupation.

Kashmir is and will be a part of India.Only India,gives a fair deal to Buddhists in Leh,to Sikhs and Hindus in Jammu. As for History, Its not a Muslim copyrighted land. It has strong Hindu roots and innumerable ancient Hindu texts quote Kashmir.With that logic ,even Pakistan cannot be only for Muslims. SECULAR INDIA is a fair deal to all religions and to the people of Kashmir who are inextricably a part of India. So Roy, we know you are an apostate to the nation,to the people of India and you are the definition of the word "BIGOT".

The timing could not be more appropriate for a maxim from Panchatantra (India ancient fables) to people who speak without forethought.

अदेशकालज्ञमनायतिक्षमं यदप्रियं लाघवकारि चात्मनः ।
योऽत्राब्रवीत्कारणवर्जितं वचो न तद्वचः स्याद्विषमेव तद्वचः ॥

- पञ्चतंत्र, काकोलूकीय

If one speaks without knowledge of place, or time, or without fore thought, or discomforting others, or diminishing oneメs own weight, or without any reason, such a speech will be as dangerous as poison.

- Panchatantra, Kakolukiya

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Art speaks to the passion and to the intellect


Art is any work of creativity by an artist,which is beautiful.Passion is the eagerness of person has to accomplish a task.The task can be cracking an exam,winning in the soccer match at high school or even keeping one's room clean & tidy.Without passion even the easiest task becomes an ordeal.Intellect is the capacity for rational thought and inference.The artist must have the innate passion and the intellect to create a work of Art,which stands out as a masterpiece.Hence,I believe that Art,indeed speaks to the passion and to the intellect.


I will try to elucidate my view by borrowing some terms from Ancient Indian Philosophy like Icha(desire,passion), Gnana(intellect), Kriya(execution).For any work of Art,the Artist must have had the desire,the passion to give expression to the Art form.His enthusiasm would have made him passionately look for solutions to depict the Art form.This is the power of passion or "Icha Shakti".The Art form would then evolve from an inchoate stage of a poser,to its completion.In process,the artist would toil hard with his intellect to find answers to the poser.He would use his intellect to create the work of Art in his mind and excute it in a physical medium.This is where the Power of Intellect(Gnana Shakti) and the power of execution(continuance of intellect) come into play.


Let's assume that an artist wants to create a painting that potrays the Israeli palestinian conflict.The artist must have the intellect to choose this topic before starting to paint this source of inspiration.The Artist must be passionate for trying to capture, such a profound theme in a canvas.His passion might have had roots from his personal experiences.He might have decided to give an expression to this embryonic idea,after seeing a palestinian teenager,taking a risky step in attacking an Israeli patrol.This live scene ,the artist witnessed would have evoked the passion,to bring the suffering of the people of Palestine and Israel to the world by his canvas.The artist would use his intellect to vividly bring his experience to the people by sketching his work.


A live example of works of Art, that have been acclaimed world over for their creativity,are the plays of poet Kalidasa in Sanskrit.Kalidasa wrote the play 'Raghuvamsha' which describes the lineage of Lord Rama(A hindu God).Kalidasa's passion could have been his pure devotion to Lord Ram.This would have made him embark on a project that describes the Ancestors of Ram in a play.Kalidasa might have used his intellect to discern the qualities of Lord Ram and tried to bring those qualities in his ancestors as well,resulting in a work of Art proclaimed to be one of the most beautiful compositions in Sanskrit literature.


Another example is from hollywood.Film maker Mira Nair lost her mother before she started on the film 'Namesake'.The intense grief of losing a family member,especially mother would have been very difficult to bear.Yet the grief here has evoked the passion. Directer Mira nair has recounted her personal experiences that made her direct this film.She has used intellectual insight to capture the bereaved expat-Indian mindscape,It's struggle to adjust and cope in an occidental society. Such works of Art not only are the result of passion and intellect from the creator,but also pulsate with intellect of the audience and bring out the passion in them.


Both passion and intellect thus serve as the parent,for Art.Both of them are thus indispensable for an artist.An artist would not try to downplay or sudbue the influence of any of these two facets to enable his creation.No wonder,Art art speaks to the passion and to the intellect.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

India’s CASTE System : CASTIGATED and Misconstrued

  • I would like to begin this entry by quoting one of the primordial scriptures our religion –

    One must not treat any body badly even when they are physically handicapped, uneducated, the aged, ugly, poor people, people of lower castes. One must treat everyone as equal.
    - Manu Smriti

    I reckon,that writing about India’s Caste System requires a profound understanding of our ethosand tenets,of which I am no savant.Nevertheless,I shall make an honest attempt.First,I would like to dispel some myths about our caste system.

    HOW IS CASTE DECIDED?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I see claims like “caste, the complex social order which assigned people a place in the social hierarchy based on their occupation”

    I differ and vouch to come back with dictum's in our scriptures that unequivocally evince that:-

    The Caste System is based on OCCUPATION and BIRTH.If a Brahmin begin’s to rule a kingdom ,he becomes a Brahmana Kshatriya.If he becomes to get into trade and business,he becomes a Brahmana Vaishya and so on.

    With the caste census being talked about many people think "Will caste ever wither away - with or without a caste census - from India's social landscape?”

    ..They also believe that the Caste System is at Fault and therefore, Culpability rests on it ,rather than the people itself,Caste system is obsolete and detrimental to our society.

    I seek to offer the stand of our religion on this system.

    LEGITIMACY OF CASTE SYSTEM:-
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I would like to ratiocinate the legitimacy of caste system in India. The West and now, our own Media andreformists,leaders and some people fromthe fourth varna or caste(I do not wish to call it lower caste) have accused our Caste system of being bigoted, discriminatory and evil. Let’sforget the politics for a moment and try to understand the Caste system in its own merit.

    1.Rebirth and Caste : Fate and Free will
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Why is it so,that a toddler born in a rich family, enjoys a comfortable life from the beginning and one in a poor family endures the plight of destitution? Why can’t God decide every one to be equal? Why can’t God ensure that life on this planet begins with equality OR égalité? Why is a soul born as an elephant calf or a spider on this planet than a human? Why does a person ,despite being hardworking and honest,does not necessarily become as successful as desired? Why is a person more lucky and successful than the other? What is Fate and what is Free-Will? Should a person work hard to succeed or should he rely on Fate?

    The answer lies in Karma.I would like to cite from a someone very
    reveredin the book : ‘Dialogues with the Guru’

    [ http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/2277818 ] ,
    excerpts from which are used in quotes to justify the Caste System

    “As a follower of our Sanatana Dharma, you must know that fate is nothing extraneous to yourself, but only the sum total of the results of your past actions.As God is but the dispenser of the fruits of actions, fate, representing those fruits, is not his creation but only yours. Free-will is what you exercise when you act now.

    “Fate is past karma; free-will is present karma. Both are really one, that is, karma, though they may differ in the matter of time. There can be no conflict when they are really one.”

    Hence understood, a person wins his/her caste by his actions in previous births.

    If a person believes in our RELIGION,he believes in REBIRTH. As our religion says that a soul/atmanis born again and again as it assumes a body in each birth,till escapes the cycle of births and deaths to attain salvation by its ‘Karma’.

    A person being born in Brahmin Caste has more responsibilities.He should strive to live up to his duties and set an example to others in the society.He should respect all every individual irrespective of their caste(see the shloka – verse in the beginning).

    2. Samanya Dharma (common laws) and Vishesha Dharma (special laws).
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    In an Organization there are rules of conduct and directions of ‘Ethics and Fairplay’ that apply to all employees.There are special duties and higher responsibilities assigned to the higher management and a seperate set of duties for employees in the lower title based on ‘Competency level’.Does it mean if a CEO or an Employee flouts the rules and misuses his position of power,the whole system is guilty? Fact is, that the good and bad breed are seen everywhere.

    Quoting the book again:-

    “Our system and,In fact any system which aims at the regulation of conduct must be based on the principle of ‘adhikara’ or competency.Those who belong to the castes are competent to pursue the Vishesha Dharma;the others are competent to pursue only Samanya Dharma.Further the nature of the competency required can be learnt only from the Sastras which prescribe the Dharma.”

    Brahmin by Birth and Action,say before 1000 years : Brahmins generally had“The feeling of rest and peace,contentment and happiness,was normal,natural and healthy and therefore lasting.””Such a feeling is born and ingrained in a Bramhana especially,and if he neglects it and seeks happiness in the outside world,he is seriously impairing his chances of getting it again in the next birth”

    Hence whatever be our caste, we should adhere to the rules of conduct that are common or special to our caste.I agree that some Brahmins have done their share of injustice in the society and there have been rotten apples in the barn.Similarly ,some of the Kshatriyas or the Kings, by their misrule and disunity have looted the wealth of the people,surrendered to the Colonial Raj to hold their royalty.

    By straying away from their ordained path,they have in a way nurtured discontent and in a way, channed the anger towards the Upper Caste and the Caste System as a whole.The results that followed are not surprising.

    Brahmins have been ostracized by the Dravidian movement in the South –
    [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Brahminism ] .If born a Brahmin in TamilNadu,a boy cannot dream of getting into a good medical college despite 95% percentile due to rampant reservation.Same is true in Govt Engineering colleges.

    I fully support reservation in terms of economic incentives for the backward class ,but admissions to any higher educational institution should be based on PURE MERIT and not CASTE.So,in a way reverse discrimination seems to be the theme used by politicians to divide our society.

    Demonizing one caste or to bash our Caste system without the knowldge of what is actually says,by just being carried away by foreign /local media or the views of the socio-political landscape is not fair.

    THE SOLUTION : Caste System in the Contemporary Era:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Emancipation of the people of the fourth varna(caste) is essential.We should strive for getting modern education to our deprived fourth varna.

    The political parties in our country have mastered the art of insular politics to foment hate among castes and pile up votes.They don’t want unity between 4 varnas.They seek to divide us by virtue of our caste and the fourth varna being the majority and economically backward, makes it an ideal selling cake for pliant vote-bank.

    Sanskrit – the Elixir ?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Government has a responsibility for the spiritual well being of its people.To the very least,it should reign supreme to counter the massive smear propaganda against our religion,which runs amok without the knowledge of our scriptures.

    Why so much dissonance on this issue? Its simply lack of understanding, which can be addressed by introducing Sanskrit in our Schools and mandatory for Hindu children.Sanskrit ,when promoted as a lingua franca will address the issue of obliviousness to our scriptures.It will not create unrest in South as dravidian languages retain more Sanskrit words and as for Tamil language,It jells so well with Sanskritas akin to mixing Milk and Honey.Even Germany gives more importance to Sanskrit than we do.

    How can we forget the language that defines our culture and lifestyle ? Should we not be ashamed for pushing this beautiful language to oblivion and adopting a foreign language to overshadow it for the fear of being called not secular? India needs English and regional languages, but it also needs Sanskrit if it wants an identity.

    Knowledge of Sanskrit will be our vent into our scriptures,it would stand up toagainst the calumnies on our religion and the caste system.It will ensure we preserve the ancient wisdom of India,its ethos in our daily lives.It would on top of all,unify us as the ‘People of India’.Than focusing on the political harvest from the caste based census..

    -Governmentshould promote unity and respect among the Caste’s and the sense of Pride in a united India, than carry notion to destroy the Caste system,which we know it cannot.
    -Government should realize,that however powerful it may be ,it should not seek to meddle into the primordial Caste System.It should instead focus on its sole purpose – Development.
    -The Supreme Court should ban any political party that has an ideology or a record of hate towards one particular caste.
    -The Government should respect the views of our religion andCaste system implied by reason or at least keep quiet on the Caste System and our religion by treating it sacrosanct ,than holding it accountable for our fallacies,it should hold itself and the people who have erred,responsible for poor development and corruption .

    Middle class Renaissance
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The middle class have led revolution in France,Russia or any other society.The middle class has the onus to divest its apathy towards the politics of this country.The middle class should manifest itself as a formidable votebank that is not lured by Caste abasement or any kind of parochialism ,but by competence,development and performance. By helping our fourth caste stand up in the Knowledge economy,we can ensure their wellbeing and also make India operate at the frontiers of science and technology ,yet happily holding on to our roots.And this is only possible if the middle class knows about our scriptures,it knows Sanskrit,it can see Perspectives on both sides of the aisle and decide for itself.

    I would end by the words 2 great tamil poets (fromsecond century C.Eand the past millennium) from whom we as Indians should realize - ‘Knowledge’ and ‘Unity of this country’ are inextricably linked.

    Subramaniya Bharati –

    "Ayiram undhu igne Jathi,Yenil Anniyar vandhu pughalenna Nidhi"
    - We may have thousand of sects; that, however, does not justify a foreign invasion.

    Avvaiyar (The Granny Poet of the Tamil heartland) –

    "Katrathu Kai Mann Alavu, Kallathathu Ulagalavu"

  • Avvaiyar (The Granny Poet of the Tamil heartland) –

    "Katrathu Kai Mann Alavu, Kallathathu Ulagalavu"
    - What we have learnt is mere handful.The unlearnt and the unconquered is as big as the world.
    And thus we would begin to fathom that our religion is indeed ‘Sanathana’ or Eternal.

Monday, March 8, 2010

A 1000 years of Wonder


There is a well known Jinx, floating around about the Periya Kovil(Big Temple) of Thanjavur.People have muttered that, the fate of any prominent political figure,who visited or saw the Gopuram of this temple ,did not end well.Some have tried to cite how Indira and Rajiv Gandhi have visited Thanjavur.It is even said that, a former Chief minister's cavalcade passed in front of the temple only after its Gopuram was covered with thatches.

Well, 'Brihad' means Big in Sanskrit.Brihadeshwara thereby as the 'Bigger Lord'.

Today, I wish to talk about something, for which I am grossly inept.How can somebody be adroit in describing the Marvel that has stood for a 1000 years(1010-2010 AD).Which has seen an, emperor, a Tamil maven, who built this Temple. The symbol of His devotion has stood timeless.

The engineering splendor of this temple is discernible by just,its Gopuram as the Shadow is not cast on the ground.The mammoth stone on the top, is a single piece of rock.Reasearches now concede that, a 5 degree man made slope was built to take the stone up the acclivity,many kilometers and slide down, so that elephants could drag the stone at its place.Then comes the BigNandi,the Linga, possibly the biggest in India.Aptly Brihad!!.I still remember the day I got placed,I went to this temple and looked agape at the lord who seemed bemused with my little offer letter.


The Hub :
At the epoch of the Chola empire,this temple represented the lord and the grandeur of the people,who would toil hard on the riverbanks of the Cauvery.Craftsmen would quarry hard granite stone,by first inserting small holes into the rock and leave it wet to be broken after days.The harvest in the kingdom would be so large ,that pachyderms would be used as thresher mammals.Ships near the Thanjai dockyard would stockup spices to be shipped to sumatra and Java with some being downloaded with Eelam (todays Srilanka) chillies.Shilpadhari's would fastidiously use gold and copper to mold statutes with grace.The method of using mud daubing to create such art used even today.People,at dusk would gather at the temple to see the devadasis dance to the lord on a pradosha.A socio-cultural and religious Hub indeed!!.


BrihanNayaki(Goddess who controls the Large) at the sanctum sanctorum ,would be a place for myriad alankaras and Brahmin's would hum the Saundarya Laheri.

The rise and fall of a nation is manifest.Raja Raja Chola and his empire did not last forever,but the temple has witnessed monumental changes to the subcontinent.It has stood unperturbed with the islamic invasion,endured the Raj and now ,a self abashing Dravidian movement.Maybe because the Big Lord seldom needs to look at such extraneous aberrations.


The temple still has a engraved names of the workers in Tamil and people involved at the temple during its construction.Even the devadasis and their addresses in their time were engraved as suggested on the ornate outer walls with beautiful gargoyles on top.Unlike the Taj mahal ,where it is alleged that workers were awarded with abscission of hands for their dexterity,the names on the Chola Big temple seem to be preserved in sempiternity for their devotion.



To the Jinx now.No one knows the level of reverence of the Gandhis and to the proponents of the Jinxed theory,when considered jinxed,every event seems to be misrelated and when kowtowed with deference,serenity follows.The fault therefore,cannot be attributed to the Lord or his abode at all.The day,when the Tamil people realize the importance of these temples and hold them with the same reverence as their ancestor's , will they begin to see the beauty of Tamil as a form of Murugan and learn to cherish and foster what is truly an elixir in today's world with only pecuniary ends.

Panorama - Take a tour:

For a 360 degree panoramic view of this magnificent temple please visit here.You may or may not get a chance to travel here,but a virtual tour at different spots inside the temple,seems a good option if you are seated abroad.

Learn more and do donate to this temple if possible - Wikipedia has good info if not whole : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brihadeeswarar_temple

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Greater India



Though the primary objective of this blog is to bring the beauty,color and flavor of India to its readers,there will be no shying away from themes that concern India today.There will be no faltering to touch upon controversial and uncomfortable topics.

As a citizen of India,does it not obligate us to be opinionative of the governance,politics,socio-economic issues that this country tackles or tries to circumvent.Today I wanted to share some thoughts on one of the most controversial topics debated in India : The rationale for 'Partition of India' and the 'Kashmir Conflict'.

Before my views,lets get the connotation from Mythology, on India right:

उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम् ।
वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम भारती यत्र संततिः ।।
"The country (varam) that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is calledBhāratam; there dwell the descendants of Bharata."

and thus even the Pakistani of today resides in the 'Greater India' .. and do have a look at the EPIC map : - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EpicIndia.jpg

.. And 'Greater India' will be the essence of this blog!!

I hope at least now,the claim on Kashmir from Pakistan would be rightfully absurd and obsolete and yet if,there is dissonance,please read on..

Part 1
Partition of India : A Galactic Mistake in the annals of History

The Premise:

The reasons for dividing India was just one,a country for the muslims of the subcontinent was necessary for equality and justice when India becomes free. The British wanted two nations as publicly evinced ,that they will save some religions disturbance and rioting if separate nations were created.As if they would really care, partition did create one of the worst religious riots ever seen and I am sure not one British soldier or General wanted to control the situation.

I believe there was a more sinister reason for insisting on partition.The British wanted to deface the image of the egalitarian non violent freedom movement in India.They plotted to delay independence of the crown jewel of the empire by tying up the issue with partition .It would have certainly concurred at the helm of the colonial administration that the topic would generate enough imbroglio to dally the issue.

I believe the whole premise behind partition , that a land for one religious cult is flawed.Let's assume that one cult rationale to be valid,the diversity of India will no longer the reason to bring home the bacon.Is there a single plaudit that the break away nation has earned in the last sixty years?

The Present:

Satire can be vivdly drawn from the fact that it has created a professional satanic intelligence service,army that hold the state to ransom and has a facade of democracy as veil .It has managed to be labeled as the 'international migraine'.It has succeeded in fermenting hate and laments against India and mastered the art of counterfeit Indian currency.Above all it seems to flaunt the identity of being a global hub of terror.It blackmails stakeholders in return for cooperation in terror fight against aid, has exacerbated the Afghan conflict by poking a noxious anti-India strategic angle to the problem.

The Future:

From the Baloch unrest to the holocaust of Bengali citizens in the bereaved East Pakistan, the break away state has shown no respect for its people.The Pakistani ambassador to Bangladesh said "Let Bygones be Bygones" wanting to bury the Bengali holocaust in 1971 war chronicles.Such a blemished history with cycles of coups and political upheavals sets stage for the break up.A monumental time when Balochistan gains independence from a state that discriminates on resources and rights to governance.A time when the so called 'Azad Kashmir' realizes that 'azad' is a misnomer for a future of a career in terror camps than one with opportunity and hope in the Indian Union.




The 'Idea of India' is unity despite diversity of religion and culture and the solemn commitment to the secular values we cherish, a society where parochial tendencies are loathed.As India poises before its role in the brighter side of history,the idea of Unified India as the utopian paradise for humanity seems ever more palpable.




Sunday, February 14, 2010

Debut

Namaste,

Since its inception in the mid nineties, the term blog seemed good for poseurs,but I dare say now that such a notion not true any more as I have created one.

I have started this blog to evince the love I share for India.India is not just a country, its a subcontinent.From the Silk route in the snow clad Himalayas to the sea shores ofTirucendur,India bamboozles the speculative traveler. Perhaps no word captures the enigma,that is India.

Home to more than a billion people , India unites in its diversity.It has never invaded in its 3000 year history and has sustained and thrived with the oldest religion on the planet.Our roots have begun in this country, a country rich in history, culture, spirituality, sights, architechture, not to mention being the world's oldest democracy(I did not say the largest yet,because few would reckon the rootages of democracy lie in one of the most told epics in India) , a country which brought forth number zero, the game of chess and a myriad of other accomplishments.

When you first set foot into this country, you can actually 'smell' it. India has a distinct fragrance--whether it be of camphor, incense, spices,turmeric,smoke,cows, people, food, cars,grease and anything you imagine. You are immersed into the country from the very first step you take outside the airplane.

But nothing could be more real than this lovely anecdote below that seems to capture the essence of India

"
Jack Lush
Seattle, WA
2009-01-06 01:49:31

In 1984 I was fourteen and lived in the village of Chikhale, Maharastra.

It was December; a planned pilgrimage to Goa had to be cancelled so we went east into Maharastra. I didn't know where we were going and I still don't know where we went. After hours on a bus into an arid dusty landscape we came to a large rock hill. I vaguely recall being told this hill was a sacred place and many came from all around to climb and pray. There were stairs embedded in the rock and it was a long climb to the top. About half way up I noticed a man sitting in a crevasse, there were monkeys all around him and yet he did not move. He sat cross-legged, long white hair draped to his knees, he only wore a white tunic and he never moved. The monkeys walked on him, around him, nested near him and sat with him yet he did not move. I couldn't take my eyes off him. I stood there transfixed by his locked serenity. He became part of the rock, the hill, the cloudless sky and watchful monkeys.

Now the image of the Hindu ascetic from years ago, in place I may never find, calms me at times, and will forever be my picture of India."


I hope this blog bring to you the culture, traditions, mannerism, friendliness,humility and the profound humanity,this fascinating country encapsulates.Discover the India in you,because being born in India is not the only reason to fall for this land,as the aroha of India belongs to the world.Open thyself to it and India welcomes you with open arms with this Debut